1)
Was Alexander really that “Great”? I believe
that he appeared to be that great, but in reality he wasn’t because he was never really in Macedon, his father should've been called great instead of him, and he didn't treat his army the way he shoud have. Why was he given
this title if he was actually an atrocious man? Even though he conquered some 3,000 miles of land and was the
King of Macedon, that shouldn’t be the only reason to call someone great. If
someone is considered to be great, then they would be able to conquer all that
land while making choices that benefits everyone, and not just themselves. But
a reason why he was thought of as great, is because he did all of this at a
young age, probably around 20 to 25. He also was the only one who could tame
and ride the horse Buchephalus.
This name meant “ox-head”. This horse was King Phillips horse, and he claimed
the horse was “too tough to break to riding”. So he was going to sell the
horse. Alexander then asked if he could have a chance to tame the horse. His
father gave him one and he succeeded. This may be a reason he was looked at as
“great”. While being considered a
son of god by some people, other people hated him for his cruel ways. Some
citizens in Macedonia didn’t like him that much because he was rarely
ever in Macedon. He was too busy conquering other empires, so he was hardly
ever in Macedonia. Since he wasn’t there to rule them, he put Antipater
in charge. So the question is, who was the real King of Macedon? I feel that
Alexander seems awfully selfish. He does what he wants and doesn’t really care
about what he’s doing to other people. I think the main reason Alexander was
great was because of his father, Philip. Since Philip did most of the work,
like growing Macedon, building a strong army, and had ideas and battle plans .
Philip did that, not Alexander. His father’s plans were to conquer Persia, but
he got assassinated before he could do that. When Alexander got his father’s
title, as King of Macedon, his first plan was to conquer Persia. A reason they
wanted to conquer Persia because it “was the greatest empire the
world had yet seen, extending from Central Asia to Libya”. After he did
that he got power hungry and decided he wanted to conquer more lands, like the Mediterranean
and Egypt. Something that I found kind of surprising was that he didn’t
change any local administration in the areas he conquered. He kept them the
same and didn’t bring in any of his own. He left things pretty much the same, although
he might have had some Macedonian citizens’ act as governors. But a not-so-good
thing was that he didn’t realize was that his soldiers were getting tired from
all this fighting. All they did was fight and they didn't get many breaks. Alexander didn’t have much peace while he was in control. He
didn’t want to stop. He wanted to keep going and going. He didn’t think about
the soldiers who were actually fighting for something that Alexander wants, but
maybe some didn’t want it. His army beared with him, until they were
moving farther and farther away from home. When Alexander told his army that
they were going to try and get India, they thought it was a step too
far. His army was very tired and they could not do much more. They wouldn’t
obey any of Alexander’s commands. He tried to persuade them into fighting, but
soon realized it was no use and it was time to head back home. Since Alexander
wanted soldiers who could fight, he actually threatened his original soldiers
by telling them that he would change them out for Persian soldiers. None of the
original soldiers liked the thought of that, so they were like well alright we
will do it. In Persia people actually bowed down to him and treated him like a
god. In Macedonia-Greece, they did not do that. Because of this, Alexander
liked Persia, and the east, better. He actually started dressing like them too.
When he came to Macedonia-Greece, people were like what are you doing. This is
another reason why he was not a good king. Greeks and Macedonian people
believed that they should only be bowing down to people/gods who are not alive.
Persians actually bowed down to Alexander. Greeks and Macedonians did not think
this was right. Even thought he might be considered a good general, he was not
a good king at all. They were questioning who Alexander really was,
just like we are questioning if he should really be called great now.
2)
If a country likes their leader, and their
leader is not a good person, then that means their country may not be a good
country or it might mean they value different things than other countries do.
In Germany, some people actually thought Hitler was a good man. People have
said that because of (anti-social) Jews, Germany
had lost its moral code and had become debased and de-cultured. Apparently
Hitler never meant to kill the Jews, but just to keep them somewhere that was
not Germany. He also cared for animals and banned animal experiments. People
also saw him as a man of God and he said his movement was Christian. Him and
Mahatma Gandhi were apparently in alignment; “they both recognized the evil
force they were up against”. These are the good reasons on why he did what he
did. He had a bad childhood, and that is probably a reason why he did this
horrible thing. Like I said before, some people didn’t think he was horrible at
all, some may have considered him a great person. A reason that Hitler did all
of this might be to get revenge to the bad childhood he had. Adolf Hitler
couldn’t get into art school or architecture school. A reason for this was that
he wasn’t creative. He didn’t come up with extraordinary masterpieces. He
didn’t have any friends, and he didn’t have any interest in women. He then got
bored with his life, so he decided to live in the opposite world of his—in the
world of imagination. People in Vienna lived very much like Hitler. They tended
to look for simple answers. Vienna had many different organizations whose
followers believed and “imagined they can solve the world’s problems”. One of
these “problems” was the racial mixing in Germany and Austria. There was a
Viennese magazine called the Ostara. This
magazine said that blond Germanic people were a “Master Race” and they were
“destined to rule the world”. So the Jews and other races were viewed as
enemies of this race. Anti-Semitism was the hatred of Jews. Hitler then became
obsessed with this, this explains why he did everything he did (Schlesinger,
23). The government in Austria saw him as weak and they said he was unable to
bear arms, so they wouldn’t take him into their military. After he got
rejected, he went back to Munich. He was attracted to Munich, Germany because
of their artistic life, and so he thought he might be able to find a career
there (Schlesinger, 24-26). He saw that there was a war going on in Germany
(World War I), and so he was very glad that this happened. He actually had been
waiting for a war since he was a young kid, when he was playing with his toy
soldiers. He was glad that was finally something that he could really be
involved in. Since Austria didn’t want him, he went to the German military. He
got in and was an excellent soldier. The German’s ended up losing the war. When
Hitler came back to Germany, the whole city had changed. He didn’t really know
what to do. There was an opportunity to be a part of a newly established
moderate representative government in the army. Adolf thought he was fit for
the job because he “had a passionate hatred of foreigners and communists” (Schlesinger,
33). He got an official job as an education officer. He promoted nationalism
and discouraged socialism for soldiers. There were many political organizations
and Hitler was sent to observe them. One day he came across the German Workers
Party. They had the same thought that the magazine had—that Germans were the
master race and Jews and other religions “threatened their purity”. I believe
that most likely only the Germans thought this, everywhere else in the world
thought these people were crazy. Soldiers were normally not allowed to join any
political parties, but since they wanted to fix Germany and their army, they
let him. He was then elected to the executive committee and was put in charge
of propaganda. The party wasn’t popular at all. Not many people knew who they
were. Hitler then decided to take all the parties money and make an
advertisement for a huge meeting. Around 70 people showed up for the meeting
and Hitler’s speech was a huge success. All Hitler’s speeches were very
persuasive. “Hitler
was probably the hero of the second world war and the 21st century. A man of
ethical courage, a man of spiritual perception and good intent. A spiritual
soul who cared – cared about all life forms, all cultures, about goodness and
Light and ultimately about Truth.” This is a thought that some people
believe to be true. Some people think he’s great, and some people don’t.
Everyone has their own opinions and that’s just how it is.
Adolf Hitler |
3)
Walt Disney didn’t actually succeed right away.
A newspaper editor actually fired him because “he
lacked imagination and had no good ideas.” That’s shocking since now he is
known for all these animations and creations. No one thought he was good then. While
he was making The Alice Comedies, he
ran out of money and his company ended up going bankrupt. But that didn’t stop
him. He then went to Hollywood to start a new business. His brother was already
in California so he helped him out and gave him some money to start his business.
Soon after that, they got a call from New York for the first Alice
in Cartoonland (The Alice Comedies) featurette. From there, they went
to the top of Hollywood society. Although
he didn’t give up, he kept going. Time and distance do impact someone’s popular
perception. They thought Walt Disney couldn’t do much, and didn’t have any
creativity, but now he’s thought as one of the most creative people to live. I
think it depends on the further you go, the better or worse people think about
you. Someone’s opinion about Walt Disney might have been different then, but if
they see what he has done now, their opinion may have changed.
Walt Disney |
Works Cited
"10 Reasons Why Hitler Was One of the Good
Guys." Wordpress. N.p., 16 Jan. 2013. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.
<http%3A%2F%2Fdiggerfortruth.wordpress.com%2F2013%2F01%2F16%2F10-reasons-why-hitler-was-one-of-the-good-guys%2F>.
"50 Famously Successful People Who Failed At
First." OnlineCollege.org. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.
"Alexander of Macedonia." Alexander of
Macedonia. San Jose State University, n.d. Web. 25 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.sjsu.edu/faculty/watkins/alexandergreat.htm>.
"Alexander the Great." Ushistory.org.
Independence Hall Association, n.d. Web. 23 Sept. 2014.
Ansari, Ali. "Alexander the Not so Great." BBC
News. N.p., n.d. Web. 25 Sept. 2014.
Staff, LiveScience. "Top 10 Reasons Alexander the Great
Was, Well ... Great!" LiveScience. TechMedia Network, 10 Dec.
2004. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.
Wepman, Dennis, and Arthur M. Schlesinger.
"1-3." Adolf Hitler. New York: Chelsea House, 1985.
7-106. Print.
"What Regions Did Alexander the Great Conquer? -
Curiosity." Curiosity. Discovery Channel, n.d. Web. 25 Sept.
2014.
Worthington, Ian. "How "Great" Was Alexander?
[P.1]." How "Great" Was Alexander? [P.1]. N.p., n.d.
Web. 23 Sept. 2014.
Worthington, Ian. "Was Alexander Really Great?: A Great
General vs. a Great King ." World History: Ancient and Medieval
Eras. ABC-CLIO, 2014. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.
"Walt Disney: Long Biography." Walt
Disney: Long Biography. N.p., n.d. Web. 26 Sept. 2014.
<http://www.justdisney.com/walt_disney/biography/long_bio.html>.
Mayor, Liz. "Alexander the Great - Heroic Villain or
Villanous Hero?" - Classical Studies. N.p., n.d. Web. 29 Sept.
2014. <http://www.open.ac.uk/Arts/classical-studies/alexander.shtml>.
I like how in question 2 you thought about both parties' points of view, but it was that clear to me, but then again it takes me a while to get these types of points, but overall great post.
ReplyDeleteYou did really well on answering the 3rd question and showed how time and distance impact someone's perception! I did not know that Walt Disney got fired for having a "lack of imagination". I believe that he has one of the best imagination's, which shows that time does impact your perception of someone.
ReplyDeleteI liked a lot of your response to the first question. I thought it was interesting how you said that Alexander's father should be considered great instead of Alexander. Another thing I liked about your post was when you mentioned how Alexander did not change the government when he captured new places. I hadn't really thought about it that way, but you make a great point by saying that he really wasn't interested in actually ruling Macedon.
ReplyDeleteAre you trying to say that walt was only famous because of his expansion of time it took or are you saying that walt used his creativity to become the best and if you chose the second question how does that have to do with the time and distance answer
ReplyDeleteExcellent job of answering the questions, you went into great detail answering question number one and explained what you felt really well. I agree in question to where you talk about a good reason, because of his childhood, I don't think it justified him, but yes, his childhood could have very easily lead to him making some of the decisions he made. There are some seemingly random facts here or there that are distracting, and you also gave more of a history on Hitler than what people valued/value as "greatness". You didn't explain much about the change, but once again gave more of a history about him. Over all I liked the facts and sources you used, your information was very good!
ReplyDeleteI'm saying that Walt took a while to show everyone how creative that was and that didn't happen right away, it took time.
ReplyDelete